Skip to content
xOperon

Handling Class Imbalance and Small Training Sets

Building Deep Learning Models for Medical Image Classification: Challenges and Solutions

Deep learning has revolutionized medical image classification. This article provides a comprehensive guide to building your own deep learning model for interpreting chest X-rays, focusing on detecting multiple diseases with a single model. We will explore the training process, key challenges, and effective strategies to overcome them.

Understanding Chest X-ray Interpretation

Chest X-rays (CXRs) are among the most common diagnostic imaging procedures in medicine, with approximately 2 billion taken annually worldwide. Their interpretation is crucial for detecting numerous diseases, including pneumonia and lung cancer, which affect millions.

A radiologist, trained in CXR interpretation, examines the lungs, heart, and other regions for clues indicating conditions like pneumonia, lung cancer, or other abnormalities.

Identifying Abnormalities: The “Mass” Example

To illustrate, consider the task of identifying a mass. A mass is defined as a lesion, or damaged tissue, seen on a chest X-ray as greater than 3 centimeters in diameter.

Imagine viewing three chest X-rays containing a mass and three normal chest X-rays. After observing these examples, you would likely be able to correctly identify a mass in a new, unlabeled chest X-ray, recognizing patterns similar to the mass examples and distinct from the normal ones.

This human learning process is analogous to how we train an algorithm to detect masses.

How an Algorithm Learns

During training, an algorithm is presented with chest X-ray images, each labeled to indicate whether it contains a mass (e.g., label = 1) or not (e.g., label = 0). The algorithm, often referred to as a deep learning algorithm, model, neural network, or convolutional neural network (CNN), learns from these labeled examples.

The goal is for the algorithm to take a chest X-ray as input and produce an output indicating the probability that the X-ray contains a mass. For instance, it might output a probability of 0.48 for one image and 0.51 for another.

Initially, these output probabilities will not match the desired labels. For example, an image with a desired label of 1 (mass) might get an output of 0.48, while an image with a desired label of 0 (normal) might get 0.51.

To measure this discrepancy, a loss function is used. The loss function quantifies the error between the algorithm’s output probability and the true desired label. Over time, as the algorithm is presented with new sets of images and labels, it learns to adjust its internal parameters to produce scores that are progressively closer to the desired labels. This iterative process, typically involving hundreds of thousands of images, is fundamental to training image classification models.

While similar to general image classification in computer vision, medical image classification presents unique challenges.

Key Challenges in Medical Image Classification

Training algorithms on medical images faces three primary challenges: class imbalance, multitask learning requirements, and limited dataset size. For each, we will explore effective techniques.

1. The Class Imbalance Challenge

The Problem: Medical datasets often exhibit a significant imbalance in the number of examples for different classes. This reflects real-world disease prevalence, where non-disease examples vastly outnumber disease examples. For instance, a dataset might contain 100 times more normal chest X-rays than those showing a mass, especially when sampling from a generally healthy population.

This imbalance can severely hinder the learning algorithm. If the model primarily sees normal examples, it tends to predict a very low probability of disease for everyone, becoming ineffective at identifying actual disease cases.

Impact on Loss Function: The standard binary cross-entropy loss measures the performance of a classification model. Let’s examine how class imbalance affects it.

Consider an example with 6 normal X-rays (label 0) and 2 mass X-rays (label 1). If, at the start of training, the algorithm outputs a probability of 0.5 for all examples:

  • Loss for a normal example (label 0, output 0.5): -log(1 - 0.5) = 0.3
  • Loss for a mass example (label 1, output 0.5): -log(0.5) = 0.3

Now, let’s calculate the total contribution to the loss:

  • Total loss from mass examples: 0.3 * 2 = 0.6
  • Total loss from normal examples: 0.3 * 6 = 1.8

Notice that the majority of the total loss (1.8 out of 2.4) comes from the normal examples. This means the algorithm primarily optimizes its updates to improve performance on the normal examples, giving insufficient relative weight to the rarer mass examples, leading to a poor classifier.

Solutions to Class Imbalance:

A. Weighted Loss

This method modifies the loss function to assign different weights to the normal and mass classes. The goal is to ensure that both classes contribute equally to the overall loss, regardless of their frequency.

  • Let Wp be the weight for positive (mass) examples.
  • Let Wn be the weight for negative (normal) examples.

To achieve equal contribution, the weights are typically set as:

  • Wp = (Number of Negative Examples) / (Total Number of Examples)
  • Wn = (Number of Positive Examples) / (Total Number of Examples)

Using our example with 6 normal and 2 mass examples (total 8):

  • Wp = 6 / 8
  • Wn = 2 / 8

With these weights, the weighted loss contribution from the mass examples (0.3 * 2 * (6/8) = 0.45) will equal the weighted loss contribution from the normal examples (0.3 * 6 * (2/8) = 0.45), thus balancing the optimization process.

B. Re-sampling

The basic idea of re-sampling is to adjust the dataset’s composition so that there is an equal number of normal and mass examples.

Process:

  1. Group normal and mass examples separately (e.g., 6 normal, 2 mass).
  2. Sample images from these groups to create a new dataset with an equal number of positive and negative samples. This often means sampling half from the positive (mass) class and half from the negative (normal) class.
    • This may lead to not including all normal examples.
    • This may lead to having multiple copies of the mass examples.
  3. When the standard binary cross-entropy loss is computed on this re-sampled dataset, there will naturally be an equal contribution to the loss from both mass and normal examples, even without applying explicit weights.

Variations of re-sampling include under-sampling the majority (normal) class or oversampling the minority (mass) class.

2. The Multitask Challenge

The Problem: While binary classification (mass vs. no mass) is a good starting point, real-world medical diagnosis often requires classifying the presence or absence of multiple diseases simultaneously from a single image. A simple approach might be to train separate models for each disease, but this can be inefficient.

The Solution: Multitask Learning Multitask learning trains a single model to perform several related tasks at once. This offers a key advantage: the model can learn shared features that are common to identifying multiple diseases, thereby using existing data more efficiently.

Implementation:

  • Multiple Labels: Instead of a single label, each example now has a label for every disease of interest (e.g., mass, pneumonia, edema), where 0 denotes absence and 1 denotes presence.
  • Multiple Outputs: The model produces multiple outputs, each representing the probability of a specific disease.
  • Multi-label Loss (Multitask Loss): To train such an algorithm, the loss function is modified. The overall loss is calculated as the sum of the individual losses associated with each disease. For instance, the total loss for an image would be the sum of the loss for mass, plus the loss for pneumonia, plus the loss for edema, etc.

Addressing Class Imbalance in Multitask Learning: The weighted loss technique discussed earlier can be applied within the multitask setting. Here, weights are assigned not only based on positive and negative labels but specifically for the positive and negative labels associated with each particular disease task. This allows for tailored weighting for each disease’s unique class imbalance.

3. The Dataset Size Challenge

The Problem: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), like Inception, ResNet, and DenseNet, are the preferred architecture for processing 2D (X-rays) and 3D (CT scans) medical images. While highly effective, these architectures are “data-hungry,” performing best when trained on millions of examples. Medical imaging problems, however, often suffer from limited dataset sizes.

Solutions to Dataset Size Limitations:

A. Pre-training and Fine-tuning (Transfer Learning)

This powerful technique addresses the data scarcity issue by leveraging knowledge gained from training on large, non-medical datasets.

Process:

  1. Pre-training: First, a CNN is trained on a massive dataset of natural images (e.g., ImageNet), where it learns to identify common objects like penguins, cats, or dogs. The network learns general features applicable to a wide range of images. For example, features useful for identifying edges on a penguin might also be useful for identifying edges on a lung.
  2. Fine-tuning: The pre-trained network, with its learned features, is then used as a starting point for the specific medical imaging task. The network is further trained (fine-tuned) on the smaller medical dataset (e.g., chest X-rays) to identify diseases. This provides a much better initial state for learning the new task compared to training from scratch.

Layer-Specific Fine-tuning: It’s generally understood that the early layers of a CNN learn low-level, broadly generalizable image features (e.g., edges, textures), while the later layers capture more high-level, task-specific details (e.g., recognizing a penguin’s head).

During fine-tuning, two common design choices are:

  • Fine-tuning all layers: Allowing all learned features to be adapted to the new task.
  • Freezing shallow layers and fine-tuning only deeper/last layers: Keeping the general low-level feature detectors fixed and only adapting the task-specific feature detectors.

This approach, known as transfer learning, is highly effective for tackling small dataset sizes.

B. Data Augmentation

Data augmentation is a technique that “tricks” the network into believing it has more training examples than are actually available.

Process: Before an X-ray image is fed into the network, various transformations are applied to it. These transformations create modified versions of the original image, effectively expanding the training dataset.

Common Transformations:

  • Rotation
  • Translation (sideways shifts)
  • Zooming
  • Changing brightness or contrast
  • Combinations of these

Key Design Considerations for Transformations:

  1. Reflect Real-World Variations: Do the transformations reflect variations expected in real-world scenarios that would help the model generalize? For example, variations in contrast are common in natural X-rays, so a contrast-changing transformation would be beneficial.
  2. Preserve the Label: Does the transformation maintain the original image’s label? This is critical. For instance, laterally inverting a patient’s X-ray (flipping left to right) would cause the heart to appear on the right side of the image. If the original image was labeled “normal,” this transformed image would no longer be normal; it would represent a rare heart condition called dextrocardia. Therefore, lateral inversion is typically not a label-preserving transformation for chest X-rays. The network must learn to recognize transformed images that still have the same label.

Examples of Data Augmentation for Other Medical Tasks:

  • Skin Cancer Detection: Rotation and flipping are useful transformations.
  • Histopathology Images: Varying shades of pink and purple are common real-world variations due to staining. Adding “color noise” (slight color shifts) can help the network generalize. Rotation and cropping are also useful.

Conclusion

Building robust deep learning models for medical image classification involves understanding and addressing specific challenges inherent to medical data. We have explored three crucial areas and their respective solutions:

  • Class Imbalance: Tackled using weighted loss functions and re-sampling methods to ensure fair contribution from minority classes during training.
  • Multitask Learning: Addressed by modifying the loss function to a multi-label (multitask) loss, allowing a single model to simultaneously detect multiple diseases efficiently.
  • Dataset Size: Overcome through transfer learning (pre-training on large natural image datasets and fine-tuning on smaller medical datasets) and data augmentation (applying label-preserving transformations to artificially expand the training data).

By implementing these strategies, developers can build more effective and generalizable deep learning models for medical imaging applications.

Core Concepts

  • Class Imbalance: A common challenge in medical datasets where there is a disproportionate number of examples between different classes, such as many more normal cases than disease cases.
  • Weighted Loss: A technique that modifies the loss function by assigning different importance (weights) to the contributions of different classes, typically to give more emphasis to minority classes.
  • Resampling: Methods used to balance a dataset by either increasing the number of minority class examples (oversampling) or decreasing the number of majority class examples (undersampling).
  • Multitask Learning: An approach where a single deep learning model is trained to simultaneously perform multiple related prediction tasks.
  • Multi-label Loss: A loss function used in multitask learning that aggregates the individual losses from each of the different prediction tasks for a given input.
  • Transfer Learning (Pre-training and Fine-tuning): A strategy that leverages a model pre-trained on a large, general dataset and then adapts (fine-tunes) it on a smaller, more specific target dataset.
  • Data Augmentation: A technique that artificially expands the training dataset by applying various transformations (e.g., rotation, scaling, brightness changes) to existing images, thereby creating new training examples.

Concept Details and Examples

Class Imbalance

Detailed Explanation: Class imbalance occurs when the number of samples in one class significantly outweighs the number of samples in another class within a dataset. In medical imaging, this is very common as rare diseases naturally have fewer positive examples than normal or common conditions. Training a model on such imbalanced data can lead to a bias where the model performs well on the majority class but poorly on the minority class, often predicting the majority class by default. Examples:

  1. A dataset of chest X-rays for pneumonia detection might contain 95% normal X-rays and only 5% X-rays showing pneumonia.
  2. An AI model being developed for a rare eye disease where only 1 in 1,000 patients in the dataset has the condition. Common Pitfalls/Misconceptions: A common pitfall is to evaluate such models solely on overall accuracy, which can be misleading; a model predicting all examples as ‘normal’ might still achieve 95% accuracy in the first example, but it would be useless for detecting pneumonia.

Weighted Loss

Detailed Explanation: Weighted loss modifies the standard loss function (e.g., binary cross-entropy) by applying specific weights to the error calculated for each class. This technique gives more significance to the errors made on minority class examples, ensuring that the model’s updates are more influenced by misclassifications of the underrepresented class. This helps prevent the model from ignoring the minority class during training. Examples:

  1. In a chest X-ray dataset with 6 normal images and 2 mass images, the loss from mass examples could be weighted 3 times higher than normal examples (e.g., weight for positive class = 6/8, weight for negative class = 2/8) to ensure equal contribution to the total loss.
  2. For a diagnostic model identifying a rare tumor, the penalty for a false negative (missing a tumor) would be assigned a much higher weight than the penalty for a false positive, encouraging the model to be more sensitive to actual tumor cases. Common Pitfalls/Misconceptions: Setting the weights incorrectly can lead to instability during training or cause the model to over-prioritize the minority class, potentially increasing false positives; careful tuning is often required.

Resampling

Detailed Explanation: Resampling techniques aim to create a more balanced dataset by adjusting the number of examples in different classes. Oversampling involves duplicating or generating synthetic samples for the minority class, while undersampling involves reducing the number of samples from the majority class. The goal is to present the learning algorithm with a more balanced view of both classes during training. Examples:

  1. Oversampling: If there are 100 images of a rare disease and 1000 images of normal cases, the 100 disease images might be randomly duplicated 10 times to create 1000 synthetic disease images.
  2. Undersampling: From the same dataset, 900 of the normal images might be randomly removed, leaving 100 normal images to match the 100 disease images. Common Pitfalls/Misconceptions: Undersampling can lead to the loss of potentially valuable information contained in the discarded majority class samples. Oversampling, especially simple duplication, can lead to overfitting because the model sees the exact same minority class examples multiple times.

Multitask Learning

Detailed Explanation: Multitask learning involves training a single neural network to perform several related prediction tasks simultaneously, rather than building a separate model for each. This approach can be more efficient, as the model can learn shared representations and features that are beneficial across multiple tasks. It can also improve performance, especially when individual tasks have limited data, by leveraging the data from other related tasks. Examples:

  1. A single chest X-ray model designed to detect the presence or absence of multiple diseases like pneumonia, mass, and edema all at once.
  2. A medical image analysis system that predicts both the location of a lesion (segmentation) and its type (classification) from the same input image. Common Pitfalls/Misconceptions: If tasks are not sufficiently related, training a single model might lead to negative transfer, where learning one task interferes with learning another. Additionally, one task might dominate the training process if their losses are not properly balanced.

Multi-label Loss

Detailed Explanation: Multi-label loss is the summation of individual loss components, typically binary cross-entropy losses, calculated for each of the multiple tasks or labels that a model is simultaneously predicting. Instead of a single output and a single loss value, the model produces an output (e.g., a probability) for each task, and the error for each task is computed and then summed to guide the overall model training. Examples:

  1. For a chest X-ray predicting ‘mass’, ‘pneumonia’, and ‘edema’, the total multi-label loss for an image would be Loss(Mass) + Loss(Pneumonia) + Loss(Edema), where each individual loss is calculated based on its respective prediction and ground truth label.
  2. In a pathology image analysis where a single image can contain multiple types of cancer cells, the multi-label loss would combine the binary classification losses for detecting each specific cancer cell type. Common Pitfalls/Misconceptions: If some labels are highly imbalanced or have different levels of importance, simply summing the losses might not be optimal. This often necessitates applying task-specific weights within the multi-label loss to account for these differences.

Transfer Learning (Pre-training and Fine-tuning)

Detailed Explanation: Transfer learning is a powerful technique for medical imaging, especially when training data is limited. It involves two main steps: first, a deep learning model is pre-trained on a very large, general image dataset (like ImageNet) to learn robust, low-level visual features. Second, this pre-trained model is then fine-tuned on the specific, smaller medical imaging dataset, adapting its learned features to the new task. This provides a strong starting point, significantly reducing the amount of data and training time required. Examples:

  1. Taking a ResNet architecture pre-trained on millions of natural images (cats, dogs, cars, etc.) and then fine-tuning it with a relatively smaller dataset of chest X-rays to detect lung diseases.
  2. Using an Inception model pre-trained on ImageNet to identify general features like edges and textures, then fine-tuning it on dermoscopic images to detect skin cancer. Common Pitfalls/Misconceptions: If the pre-training dataset is too dissimilar from the target medical dataset, the transferred features might not be as beneficial, potentially leading to ‘negative transfer’. Deciding which layers to freeze versus fine-tune also requires careful consideration; generally, early layers (low-level features) are often frozen, while later layers (high-level, task-specific features) are fine-tuned.

Data Augmentation

Detailed Explanation: Data augmentation is a set of techniques used to increase the diversity of the training data by applying various random but plausible transformations to existing images. These transformations can include rotations, translations, zooming, flipping, and changes in brightness or contrast. This ‘tricks’ the model into seeing more training examples than are actually present, which helps it generalize better to unseen real-world variations and reduces overfitting. Examples:

  1. Rotating a chest X-ray image by a small degree, shifting it slightly, or zooming in/out to simulate minor variations in patient positioning or imaging angles.
  2. Adjusting the brightness or contrast of an MRI scan to account for different scanner settings or patient-specific tissue properties, helping the model become robust to varying image quality. Common Pitfalls/Misconceptions: It is crucial that the applied transformations do not change the semantic label of the image. For instance, horizontally flipping a chest X-ray could incorrectly imply a rare heart condition (dextrocardia) if the original label was ‘normal heart’, making it an invalid augmentation if the label isn’t simultaneously updated.

Application Scenario

Imagine a research team is developing an AI model to detect a very rare, early-stage pancreatic tumor from abdominal CT scans, where positive cases are extremely scarce. To tackle this, they would apply weighted loss to penalize false negatives more heavily and use resampling (specifically oversampling the few tumor cases) to balance their dataset. Furthermore, they would use transfer learning, fine-tuning a model pre-trained on a vast general medical imaging dataset, and data augmentation (like slight rotations and intensity shifts of CT slices) to maximize the utility of their limited tumor data.

Quiz

  1. Multiple Choice: Why is ‘weighted loss’ a crucial technique when training deep learning models for medical diagnosis, especially for rare diseases? a) It speeds up the training process by reducing the number of calculations. b) It helps the model focus more on the majority class, improving overall accuracy. c) It ensures that the contributions to the loss from underrepresented (minority) classes are given more importance, preventing the model from ignoring them. d) It completely eliminates the need for large datasets.

  2. True/False: In data augmentation, it is always acceptable to apply any transformation (e.g., flipping an image) as long as it makes the dataset larger.

  3. Short Answer: Briefly explain two benefits of using multitask learning in medical image analysis.

  4. Scenario-based: A hospital wants to develop an AI model to detect a new strain of lung infection from chest X-rays. They have only 500 labeled X-rays for this new infection but access to millions of diverse natural images and a large dataset of X-rays for common conditions like pneumonia. How would you recommend they leverage ‘transfer learning’ and ‘fine-tuning’ to build their model effectively given their limited specific data?

ANSWERS

  1. c) It ensures that the contributions to the loss from underrepresented (minority) classes are given more importance, preventing the model from ignoring them.

    • Explanation: Weighted loss directly addresses class imbalance by increasing the penalty for misclassifying examples from the minority class, forcing the model to learn to recognize them better.

  2. False.

    • Explanation: It is critical that data augmentation transformations do not change the semantic label of the image. For example, flipping a chest X-ray horizontally might imply a rare heart condition (dextrocardia) if the original label was for a normal heart, making the augmented image’s label incorrect.

  3. Two benefits of multitask learning:

    1. Efficiency: A single model can learn to perform multiple related tasks simultaneously, reducing the need to train and maintain separate models for each task.
    2. Data Efficiency & Generalization: The model can learn shared features and representations across tasks, which can improve performance, especially for tasks with limited data, by leveraging information from other related tasks and potentially leading to better generalization.

  4. Scenario-based Answer: They should apply transfer learning by first taking a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model (e.g., ResNet, DenseNet) that has been pre-trained on a massive dataset of natural images (like ImageNet) or even better, on their existing large dataset of X-rays for common conditions. Then, they would fine-tune this pre-trained model on their limited 500 labeled X-rays of the new lung infection. This provides the model with strong initial feature recognition capabilities, allowing it to adapt quickly and effectively to the specific nuances of the new infection despite the small dataset size.